Amazon

Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better: Intellectual Property Analysis of Facebook, Inc. v Yahoo!, Inc.

The fight to retain investors is on. In response to Yahoo!’s recent patent infringement suit, Facebook has filed a counterclaim using ten patents of its own. Well, sort of their own. Of the patents asserted, only two were originally assigned to Facebook, which further illustrates our point that Facebook's patent activity is indicative of a company desperate for patent protection. However, Yahoo!’s litigation indicates desperation for revenue, having recently announced plans to layoff 14% of its employees. Could this fight have been avoided, sparing both litigation expenses and JOBS?

ShareThis

Domo Arigato, Amazon Roboto: Intellectual Property Analysis of Kiva Systems, Inc.

In its second-biggest acquisition, Amazon.com announced on March 19, 2012 that it would buy Kiva Systems for $775 million. Kiva started applying for patent protection a year before the company was founded (maybe Facebook should take note). If “proprietary” expectations in the form of patents were part of the premium paid by Amazon.com, the accounting for this acquisition will be interesting to see. Unfortunately, 75% of Kiva’s U.S. patents appear to be commercially impaired.

ShareThis

The Social [Amazon] Network: Intellectual Property Analysis of Amazon.com's social networking patents

Amazon owns a growing set of social networking patents that describe key aspects of Facebook and legally predate Facebook by seven (7) years. Given Facebook’s strategy of back-filling its patent portfolio to retroactively protect itself (i.e. the company filed over 410 US patent applications in the past 18 months vs its 56 granted US patents), what do these Amazon patents mean to Facebook's investors and its forecast $100 billion dollar valuation?

ShareThis

Amazon’s Fulfillment: Intellectual Property Analysis of Amazon.com’s order fulfillment patents

Last year, Amazon spent nearly $4.6 billion or 10% of its net sales on fulfillment. To offset those expenses, Amazon has been monetizing its fulfillment capabilities through arrangements with its marketplace sellers and leveraging its purchasing power with delivery companies. In 2011 alone, Amazon generated over $1.5 billion in shipping related revenue. Clearly, these fulfillment strategies are vital to Amazon as are, by default, the proprietary technologies that underpin them. Is Amazon’s intellectual property portfolio sufficient to defend these strategies?

ShareThis

Like a Deranged Easter Bunny: Intellectual Property Analysis of Amazon and the Microsoft Android Licensing Program

It's settled. We've figured out Microsoft's costume for this year's Halloween party: Ralphie's pink bunny suit from A Christmas Story.

Why?

Given its licensing program – and recently, its agreement with Quanta, Amazon’s Kindle Fire manufacturer – why not? A look at Microsoft’s IP Licensing page tells us the company “has entered into more than 700 licensing agreements and continues to develop programs that make it possible for customers, partners and competitors to access its growing, broad patent and IP portfolio.”

ShareThis
Syndicate content