litigation

Intellectual Property Analysis of Kodak’s U.S. Patent No. 7,202,982 referenced in Eastman Kodak Company v. Shutterfly Inc.

It is difficult to believe that an innovative company so pivotal to the rise of photography could be put out to pasture by misguided innovation management. Kodak, an iconic pillar of photography, has had a difficult time transitioning into the digital age. Despite its strong brand identity and extensive R&D efforts, Kodak finds itself becoming increasingly irrelevant as a market presence, grasping at straws and resorting to litigation in an effort to regain some semblance of the prominent position it once enjoyed.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Kolomoki Mounds’ U.S. Patent No. 6,370,535 referenced in Gooseberry Natural Resources LLC v. Advance Magazine Publishers Inc et al

In June of 2010, a company going by the name of Gooseberry Natural Resources LLC initiated patent infringement lawsuits against several small online press release services, claiming that they infringed on their patented method of generating a press release online. The independent defendants attempted to fight back, pointing out a number of prior art examples on the web from before the patent was ever filed.

ShareThis
Syndicate content