Oracle

Splitting the Arrow Through the Axe Head: Is Android Google’s Trojan Horse, Oracle’s Siren Song or will this Odyssey have a new ending

Why? That’s the question we’ve been asking ourselves. Maybe its obvious to most of the capital markets and pundits alike, but… standing upon the proverbial rock from which we survey the “weather” on the financial horizon… we have to wonder why Oracle would sue Google for distributing a free product that is based, in part, on another free product? Why would Oracle put the lifespan of Android (and likely the Java ecosystem as a whole) at risk of near-term death?

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Google’s IBM Patent Acquisition

In April 2011, Google’s statement of its Nortel auction bid alluded to the latest buzzword of the tech industry: patent trolls. In the past year alone, almost forty Android-related lawsuits have been filed by entities that may be attempting to stifle or monetize on the success of the Android OS – a platform that is activated in more than 550,000 devices each day. While some of these lawsuits specifically target Google, many of them target device-makers utilizing the Android platform.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Oracle Corporation. v. Google Inc.

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Oracle Corporation. On August 12, 2010, Oracle Corporation filed a lawsuit against Google Inc. alleging infringement of 7 patents relevant to the Java software platform.

ShareThis

ArcSight: HP Bets Long on the Collapse of the Patent System

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of ArcSight, Inc. On September 13, 2010, Hewlett-Packard entered into an agreement to buy ArcSight, a leading security and compliance management company, for $43.50 per share, for a total purchase price of $1.5 billion. ArcSight had been shopping itself around to several large technology companies, several of which reciprocated in their interest.

ShareThis

Isilon Systems: Traversing the Acquisition Minefield

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Isilon Systems, Inc. M&A activity in the technology sector has heated up dramatically in the past month as companies scramble to strengthen their IP positions and acquire key personnel. News of imminent rollups in the storage and security sectors specifically has driven speculation into the identity of the next impending targets.

ShareThis

Dot Hill Systems and CommVault Systems: Reading Between the Hype

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Dot Hill Systems and CommVault Systems. M&A activity in the technology sector continues to be white-hot in the wake of Hewlett-Packard’s acquisition of ArcSight and 3PAR. As in previous weeks, news of imminent rollups in the storage and security sectors has driven further speculation into the identity of the next impending targets.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Mirror Worlds LLC v. Apple Inc.

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Mirror Worlds Technologies, Inc., namely those highlighted in Mirror Worlds LLC v. Apple Inc., 08cv88, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Apple has historically been quite successful at predicting consumer preferences and has capitalized on their foresight to drive consumer demand. Their enviable position of success has opened the door to both legitimate and opportunistic lawsuits concerning their intellectual property.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc.

Microsoft, a 10 year veteran of mobile operating systems has stumbled in the space due to the failure of its Kin phone, forcing a reorganization of its consumer product unit. In a bid to regain lost ground in the mobile phone arena, Microsoft has put its vast resources behind the new Windows Phone 7 operating system. On October 1, 2010, on the eve the of Windows Phone 7 release, Microsoft sued Motorola, claiming that Motorola's mobile phones infringed on nine of its patents.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Intellectual Ventures’ U.S. Patent No. 5,987,610 referenced in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. et al.

Intellectual Ventures, Nathan Myhrvold’s intellectual property licensing company, is no stranger to the world of patents and patent litigation. Though Intellectual Ventures purports to be a champion and protector of innovation, touting the Patent Office as a marvel of invention and as a well-run machine, in truth their behavior more accurately mimics that of a patent troll than that of a knight in shining armor.

ShareThis
Syndicate content