portfolio analysis

An Offer He Couldn’t Refuse: Intellectual Property Analysis of Chris Crawford, Intellectual Ventures, and Oasis Research

Uncited prior art may hinder the strength and defensibility of patents owned by a “back-end deal” entity derived from Intellectual Ventures, currently using these patents in a lawsuit. Following the recent “When Patents Attack” article, we explore the quality of bullets used in the story’s “mafia” reference to see if it’s a real threat or a protection scheme using rubber bullets issued by the USPTO… after all, what Chris Crawford “Invented” was rejected by the Patent Office in 1996 and the patent that was issued was coached into being by a friendly patent examiner!

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Apple Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 7,966,578

On June 21, 2011, Apple Computer, Inc. (hereafter “Apple”) was awarded U.S. Patent No. 7,966,578 (hereafter ‘578) titled “Portable Multifunction Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Translating Displayed Content.” The ‘578 patent seeks to envelop a wide array of technologies related to touch interfaces currently implemented on many smart phones and tablet computers, and adds some interesting predictions about (and protections for) the future of touch interfaces.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of DataTreasury Corporation’s U.S. Patent No. 6,032,137

In 1999 and 2000, DataTreasury Corporation received two business method patents covering its check-imaging technology. DataTreasury claims that it began negotiating a check-imaging joint venture with Chase Manhattan, but the bank launched a separate check image-processing venture called Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Wireless Ink Corporation’s U.S. Patent No. 7,599,983

On March 9, 2011 Wireless Ink Corporation (hereafter referred to as Wireless Ink) won a first round court ruling in a patent infringement lawsuit against Facebook, Inc. and Google, Inc. Wireless Ink which owns Winksite, a website and mobile social networking service, has over 75,000 registered users. A mere fraction when compared to the millions of mobile users of Facebook and the traffic generated by Google’s introduction of Buzz.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Oasys Water, Inc. and Modern Water, Inc.

The future security of the world’s freshwater supply is uncertain at best. With the world’s burgeoning population pushing the demand threshold of a limited freshwater supply, it is projected that one-third of all humans will face severe and chronic water shortages by the year 2025.

Companies around the world are making significant investments in the development of such technologies. Water desalination has emerged as a preferred solution to water shortages, particularly as technological advances make desalination processes an increasingly affordable and feasible option.

ShareThis

Can an Apple a Day Keep The Trolls at Bay? Intellectual Property Analysis of MacroSolve, Inc. and Lodsys, LLC

In anticipation of the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference scheduled for June of 2011, attention should be directed to the number of patent infringement lawsuits filed against Apple, Google, and Microsoft application developers in the $10 billion mobile app market.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Progressive’s U.S. Patent No. 7,124,088

On January 12, 2011, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against a group of its competitors. The suit claims that Allstate, Liberty Mutual and Safeco have all infringed on Progressive’s U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,124,088 (hereafter ‘088) and 6,064,970. The patents in question describe and protect an online insurance policy system and vehicle monitoring system. Two weeks after the lawsuit was filed using patent ‘088, a continuation of this patent 7,877,269 (US ‘269) was granted to Progressive, containing largely similar claims.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.’s Ozonix® Cavitational Reactor Technology

Recent technologies have emerged that enable energy companies to access large reserves of previously unproducible natural gas stored in shale rock. These developments free significant new energy resources from fields formerly not viable for commercial development. The extraction of shale gas depends largely upon hydraulic fracturing (aka fracking)—a process in which water is injected into a well, cracking the shale and releasing the natural gas.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et. al.

On March 18, 2011, Imperium (IP) Holdings filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas accusing seven companies of infringing five of its patents. Imperium claims that LG, Kyocera, Nokia, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Sony and RIM have all committed infringement by manufacturing, selling or importing cell phones. The asserted patents all relate to image sensors and, in particular, photodiodes. Each of the five patents came to ESS Technology, Inc. as part of its 2003 acquisition of Pictos Technologies, Inc. from Conexant Systems, Inc.

ShareThis
Syndicate content