public domain

Intellectual Property Analysis of XPRT Online Auction and Payment Patents Referenced in eBay Lawsuit

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of XPRT Ventures. On July 13, 2010, XPRT Ventures, LLC filed a lawsuit against eBay, Inc., PayPal, Inc., Bill Me Later, Inc., Shopping.com, Inc. and StubHub, Inc., alleging that these companies had infringed six XPRT patents pertaining to online auction and payment methods.

According to the complaint, XPRT asserts that eBay stole information shared in confidence by XPRT and integrated it into its own payment systems. XPRT is demanding at least $3.8 billion in monetary damages, in addition to treble damages.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Finjan Networked Computer Security Patents Referenced in McAfee Lawsuit

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Finjan, Inc. On July 11, 2010, Finjan, Inc. filed a lawsuit against McAfee, Inc., Symantec Corp., Webroot Software, Inc., Websense, Inc., and Sophos, Inc., alleging that these companies had infringed two Finjan patents pertaining to networked computer security systems and methods.

According to the complaint, Finjan is asking for financial damages and an injunction to stop the five security companies from selling software allegedly tied to the patents.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Thomson Licensing US Patent No. 5,978,063 referenced in Thomson Licensing SAS et al. v. Chimei Innolux Corporation et al. On July 23, 2010, Thomson Licensing SAS, a subsidiary of Technicolor SA, formerly Thomson Multimed

On July 23, 2010, Thomson Licensing SAS, a subsidiary of Technicolor SA, formerly Thomson Multimedia, filed a lawsuit against three Hon Hai affiliates: Chimei Innolux, Innolux, and Chi Mei Optoelectronics, as well as MStar Semiconductor, alleging infringement of seven patents held by Thomson for thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCDs). The patents in question are: US 5,978,063; US 5,041,888; US 5,153,754; US 5,621,556; US 6,121,941; US 5,375,006 and US 5,648,674.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Uniloc Software Registration System Patent Referenced in Lawsuit with Sony, McAfee, et. al.

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Uniloc. On July 29, 2010, Uniloc USA, Inc. filed a lawsuit against seven software companies including Activision Blizzard, Sony Corporation of America, and McAfee, Inc., alleging infringement of a Uniloc USA patent describing a system for software registration. Uniloc filed a similar suit against Microsoft in 2003.

This report focuses on patents of interest which predate and are concurrent to the Uniloc patent, including public-domain alternatives.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Vlingo Corporation's Speech Recognition Patent Purchased from Intellectual Ventures and Referenced in Lawsuit with Nuance Communications

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Vlingo Corporation. On July 21, 2010, Vlingo Corporation filed a lawsuit against Nuance Communications, alleging infringement of five patents on speech recognition technologies which Vlingo recently purchased from Intellectual Ventures.

M•CAM's Patently Obvious™ is a weekly report providing visibility into potentially unconsidered alternatives, including art in the public domain, to patent holdings across a variety of technology areas.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Oracle Corporation. v. Google Inc.

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Oracle Corporation. On August 12, 2010, Oracle Corporation filed a lawsuit against Google Inc. alleging infringement of 7 patents relevant to the Java software platform.

ShareThis

Intellectual Property Analysis of Best Medical International, Inc. v. Accuray, Inc. et. al.

On August 9th 2010, Best Medical International, Inc. filed a lawsuit alleging that Accuray Corp. (NASDAQ: ARAY) benefitted from stolen trade secrets along with patent infringement of U.S. Pat No. US 5,596,619. Further, the suit claims that 4 employees, previously employed by Best Medical stole confidential and proprietary information when they quit Best Medical to work for Accuray and that this information was used in an incremental development of the Accuray CyberKnife.

ShareThis

Analysis of the Intellectual Property behind the Dell v. Hewlett-Packard Bidding War for 3PAR, Inc.

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of 3PAR, Inc. On September 2, 2010, Hewlett-Packard weathered a bidding war with Dell Computer for 3PAR, offering $2.3 billion, or $24 a share, for the company -- almost $1.15 billion more than Dell's original offer for the company.

In the frenzy of attempting to place the winning bid, neither HP nor Dell fully considered the potential liabilities associated with owning 3PAR's intellectual property. For $2 billion, HP may have purchased the right to settle over $3 billion of new patent lawsuits.

ShareThis

Analysis of the Intellectual Property behind Sanofi-Aventis' proposed acquisition of Genzyme

This week’s Patently Obvious report focuses on the patent holdings of Genzyme Corporation (NASDAQ:GENZ). On August 30th French drug maker Sanofi-Aventis SA (NYSE:SNY) went public with their offer to acquire Genzyme. The offer, at $69 dollars a share for a $18.5 billion total price, was rejected by Genzyme.

Sanofi-Aventis will have to fully consider the potential liabilities associated with owning Genzyme's intellectual property before increasing their bid. Genzyme has faced a slew of troubles recently and the cracks run deeper than the surface.

ShareThis
Distribuir contenido