Two Bites at the Apple? Intellectual Property Analysis of Apple Inc’s “Slide-to-Unlock” Patents
Report Date:
Fri, 10/28/2011 Why "two bites"? Because it's a reference to double patenting, an illegal abuse of the patent system. You know, what USPTO patent examiner, Mr. Andres Gutierrez said of Apple's latest slide-to-unlock patent, before he rejected EVERY claim Apple was applying for, THREE separate times, in this issued continuation (read: we want to get credit for an earlier patent's priority date) of ANOTHER slide-to-unlock patent.
That's a lot of CAPS, so let's unpack this apple cart piece by piece (and watch this circular firing squad composed of Deranged Easter Bunnies – last week’s theme – since we’re seeing a trend here when it comes to patent quality.)
ShareThis- 6209104
- 6455275
- 7657849
- Apple
- Chinese hamster
- Columbia University
- continuation
- double patenting
- Esther Kepplinger
- gene-splicing
- infringement
- innovation
- intellectual property
- lawsuit
- liability
- litigation
- M·CAM
- patent
- Patently Obvious
- portfolio analysis
- public domain
- rejection
- slide
- slide to unlock
- suit
- touch screen
- visibility
- Wilson Sosini

