Patently Obvious®

When most people consider the patent system, they often think of a structure in which large corporations make money selling products based on proprietary knowledge, licensing the technology to others, or suing others who infringe on the patent rights behind their most cutting-edge products. In recent years, the importance of patents and intellectual property rights as an important variable in the marketplace has come to the forefront of the public consciousness as world leaders declare their country’s lead in the innovation race. In the market, knowledge is power. Patently Obvious® increases visibility and introduces other information into the market and public discourse that can be important in making decisions in the innovation spaces discussed. This information includes innovations precedent and concurrent with the patents being discussed. In some cases, potentially interesting innovations may actually lie in the public domain.

A vast amount of precedent innovation is unconsidered by patent-granting authorities in the creation of new IP rights. Patent granting authorities including the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), European Patent Office (EPO), Japanese Patent Office (JPO), Chinese State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) and many others are constrained by the use of patent classification systems which are routinely circumvented by patent applicants.

There is a two-way social contract underlying the patent system. In the United States, patent terms are generally limited to 20 years from the date of application. A social contract is implicit in the granting of intellectual property rights; the public good is served when there is complete disclosure of the information or knowledge necessary to practice an invention or granted innovation. In return, the public has been willing to allow the grant of time-limited exclusionary zones, which have anti-competitive effects, to those who have fully disclosed their innovations. By statutory intention, once a patent has expired, the patent holder loses the right to exclude others from fully utilizing any innovation described in the patent.

A large number of patents enter the public domain when they are “abandoned” – when owners discontinue paying patent maintenance fees. Patents also only provide an exclusionary right in the country for which the patent is filed. As demonstrated by the Global Innovation Commons (G.I.C.), using intellectual property available in the public domain eliminates the need to pay licensing fees on those innovations in countries where the patent was never registered, or worldwide, if abandoned.

Patently Obvious® reports

Patently Obvious® Reports

Patently Obvious® publishes a weekly report focusing on select groups of patents in order to increase transparency in markets, addressing information asymmetries, and providing a more level playing field for all parties.


Latest Weekly Report

While Chimerix’s fully owned patent portfolio is fairly small, a number of licensing agreements have allowed the company to develop beyond its own proprietary technology. Combining in-house and licensed patents gives Chimerix a strong exclusivity position if its CMX001 and CMX157 candidates pass through clinical trials. With no glaring prior art problems and strong third-party interest in its technology, the market may be overweighting Chimerix’s IP risk.
Syndicate content

Eastern District of Texas Project

This form of Patently Obvious Report focuses on frivolous lawsuits around the country, most specifically in the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuits mentioned in our report perpetuate a parasitic business model. Using our underwriting system we do the proper diligence to indentify the un-cited prior art with respect to patents asserted in the specific cases.

learn more